Creativity and the Machine: How Technology Reshapes Language

Fabio Fossa


In scientific communications, journal articles, and philosophical aesthetic debates the words “art”, “creativity”, and “machine” are put together more and more frequently. Since some machines are designed to, or happens to, imitate human artistic creativity, it seems natural to use the same words to talk about human artists and machines which imitate them. However, the evolution of language in light of technology may conceal specific features of the phenomena it is supposed to describe. This makes it difficult to understand what machine creativity actually is and how it is connected to human creativity.

The aim of the paper is to investigate why, and in what sense, the functioning of some machines may be described in terms of artistic creativity and what is the relation between machine creativity and its human archetype. I start (§1) by introducing some general ideas concerning how language evolves alongside new technologies and focusing on the case of machine creativity. In §2 I review how some creative machines have been presented to the public, thus showing that a linguistic habit which connects machines to artistic creativity has already formed. In §3 I survey the debate on machine aesthetics and I highlight the main traits of the issue. In §4 I submit a primary scheme of machine creativity which draws on the concept of functional autonomy. Finally (§5), I argue that machine creativity cannot be mistaken for a substitute of the human kind, despite the fact that the word is the same. Creative machines are technological mediums by which new forms of human aesthetic experience can be explored. The kind of creativity machines enjoy displays a functional nature.

Full Text:



Ackermann, Evan, Four-armed marimba robot uses deep learning to compose its own music, IEEE Spectrum, 2017, Accessed: October 23, 2017.

Balkin, J., The path of robotic law, California Law Review Circuit, 6, 2015, 45-60.

Bowman, Samuel, et al., Generating Sentences from a Continuous Space, 2016, Accessed: October 24, 2017.

Bringsjord, Selmer, Bello, Paul, Ferrucci, David, Creativity, the Turing Test, and the (better) Lovelace Test, Minds & Machines, 11, 2001, 3-27.

Brown, Mark, ‘New Rembrandt’ to be unveiled in Amsterdam, The Guardian, 2016, Accessed: October 22, 2017.

Bryson, Joanna J., Kime, Philippe K., Just an artifact. Why machines are perceived as moral agents. In Walsh T. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2011). AAAI Press: Menlo Park.

Burgess, Matt, This robot uses deep learning to write and play its own music, Wired, 2017a, Accessed: October 23, 2017.

Colton, Simon, Wiggins, Geraint A., Computational creativity: the final frontier?, In: Luc De Raedt et al. (Eds.), ECAI 2012, 2012, 21-16.

Coeckelbergh, Mark, Can machines create art?, Philosophy of Technology, 2017, 30, 285-303.

Johnson, Deborah J., 2011, Computer systems: moral entities, but not moral agents. In Anderson M., Anderson S.L. (Eds), Machine Ethics, 2011, 168-183, Cambridge University Press.

Lipson, Hod, Curious and creative machines. In: Lungarella M., Iida F., Bongard J., Pfeifer R. (eds), 50 Years of Artificial Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4850, 2007, 316-320. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg.

Matt Burgess, Google’s AI has written some amazingly mournful poetry, Wired, 2017b, Accessed: October 24, 2017.

Northon, David, Heath, Derrall, Ventura, Dan, Finding creativity in an artificial artist, the Journal of Creative Behaviour, 47(2), 2013, 106-124.

XXX 2017 (blind review)

Gibbs, Samuel, Google AI project writes poetry which could make a Vogon proud, The Guardian, 2016, Accessed: October 24, 2017.

Gunkel, David J., Special Section: Rethinking art and aesthetics in the age of creative machines. Editor’s introduction, Philosophy & Technology, 2017, 30, 263-265.

Kantrowitz, Alex, Google is feeding romance novels to its artificial intelligence engine to make its product more conversational, Buzzfeed News, 2016, Accessed: October 24, 2017.

Newitz, Annalee, Movie written by algorithm turns out to be hilarious and intense, Arstechnica, 2016, Accessed: October 25, 2017.

Newitz, Annalee, An AI wrote all of David Hasselhoff’s lines in this bizarre short film, Arstechnica, 2017, Accessed: October 25, 2017.

Nudd, Tim, Inside ‘The Next Rembrandt’: how JWT got a computer to paint like the old master, Adweek, 2016, Accessed: October 22, 2017.

Sandry, Eleanor, Creative collaborations with machines, Philosophy & Technology, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s13347-016-0240-4.

Steiner, Steffen, Art: Brought to you by creative machines, Philosophy & Technology, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s13347-016-0230-6.

Wallach, Wendell, Allen, Colin, Moral machines. Teaching robots right from wrong, Oxford University Press, 2009.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

ODRADEK. Studies in Philosophy of Literature, Aesthetics and New Media Theories. 

ISSN 2465-1060

Edited by Associazione "Zetesis-Progetto di studi e Dialoghi Filosofici",

via Paoli, 15 - 56126 Pisa. Registered at Agenzia delle Entrate di Pisa, n. 3705, serie III, 23.10.2014 

Licenza Creative Commons
Odradek. Studies in Philosophy of Literature, Aesthetics and New Media Theories di Zetesis è distribuito con Licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale 4.0 Internazionale.
Permessi ulteriori rispetto alle finalità della presente licenza possono essere disponibili presso